The video presented from Autodesk University introduced very
powerful tools that are beginning to be implemented to speed up the iterative
design process that is commonly used in the architecture industry. As discussed
in class, it feels as though these same principles can translate quite easily
to engineering practice as well, regardless of discipline. Similar to the
problem introduced in the video that entailed the design of a building shell
based on the optimal ocean view, an engineer should be able to input parameters
of interest that can guide an AI platform in narrowing down design options. By
reducing the amount of time taken to develop a traditional iterative design, a collaborative
approach that integrates AI and human input can lead to much greater project efficiency
and provide an optimal design for the primary project stakeholders. By all
indications presented in the video, it appears that this methodology is close
to implementation on an industry-wide scale.
While these ideas are very attractive on the surface, there
are still substantial limitations that may make the ten year timeline proposed
in class a relatively aggressive one. First are the interoperability hurdles
that can still exist in some BIM operations. Without a robust understanding of
the program’s inner workings and capabilities, an average user may not be able
to devise the custom solutions necessary to overcome these issues. This also
relates to a second limitation – that of an idea of mainstream accessibility.
While visual programming has been hailed as a far more approachable technique
relative to traditional coding, the interface of Dynamo (and its
contemporaries) still lacks the intuitive characteristics that would be
necessary to allow engineers without sufficient coding experience to access its
capabilities for parametric design. While Autodesk appears to be on the
doorstep of providing less intimidating tools for engineers, it appears that this
technology is still in its fledgling stages.
Finally, as is often the driving force behind innovation, is
the economic factors that are in play. The cost of BIM software is currently
out of the feasible range for some smaller firms, and it can be reasonable
assumed that the addition of these tools will increase the price further.
Additionally, money will need to be spent on training of employees and creating
the system infrastructure required for its proper operation. Any tool is only
as useful as it is available to the designer, and cost could impact this on the
design end. On the construction side of the industry, while these tools unlock
new capabilities for designers (including the freeform façade shapes shown in
the video), not all projects have budgets that could accommodate custom CNC
fabrication of components. Until this technology becomes more affordable for
more standard implementation, new design tools, while fascinating, may be
limited to renderings for a large majority of project applications.
Matt,
I think your points about the need for individuals in the
AEC industry to continue to evolve is a valid one. In watching the videos and
speakers that we have had so far in class, it is definitely an intimidating proposition
to see that much of the standard practices that are in play for us at the moment
will most likely be obsolete by the time we become licensed engineers.
Weiyi,
I appreciated the comparisons that you made between the BIM’s
implementation in the AEC industry and the various ways that technology has
been integrated into other industries. I think your observation about
optimization is an important one – this may be the difference between
stagnating in BIM’s shortcomings and evolving into much more efficient
workflows.
Gabe,
The concepts of automated design are certainly intriguing,
but I agree with you that the 10 year timeline may be an aggressive one. I
think it’s also important to note that tradition roles for individuals in the
AEC industry may be very different. As more and more processes become
automated, engineers and designers must be very adaptable in order to survive
in the industry.
I am on the same page as you. I think there are still some major steps to go before everyone is fully immersed in this technology. The cost is for sure a factor in all of this, my company buys a certain number of licenses and sometimes there are not enough because as a company Revit is used for almost every project. Even we are a smaller company the owners have made the choice to invest in the new technology and I think it shows and our clients like it as well. But you make some good points.
ReplyDelete