The video that we all watched in class from Autodesk
University, “The Future of BIM Will Not Be BIM – and It’s Coming Faster than
You Think” [1], gave in an-depth look into how BIM developed, what it is
capable of today, and what it will be capable of the near future. The question is, how far away is “the near
future”, and also what industries will it affect in what timeframe? In class, Dr. Mitchell mentioned that he
would like us to speculate 10 years into the future, and to see what role BIM
will have in the AEC industry in that time; However, I believe it will take
longer than 10 years. As was clearly
shown in the video in class, some architects and designers are already using
BIM modeling in conjunction with visual coding softwares to compare design
models for optimization. I believe that
this is most helpful for them because they are designing systems from scratch
with no framework to guide them. In the
AEC industry, though, typically engineers are given a basic design (usually in
the form of DD level drawings) to begin their design work on for their
particular system. Often, this basic
design will be enough to limit an engineer’s design to a handful of options on
larger decisions like duct runs, pipe risers, and column locations. Because of this, I do not believe that this
level of BIM modeling will become integrated into the AEC industry within the
next 10 years. I think that first, it
will get more integrated in the baseline design and architecture industries
more heavily, and following that, once it is better understood and easier to
integrate, the AEC industry will more-so “adopt” it, rather than get it
integrated. The difference in “adopting”
and “integrating” in my mind, is that only small areas of the AEC industry will
utilize this level of BIM modeling, and it will also be almost fully developed
by the time the AEC industry really begins to use it to its full
potential. That is adopting, because it
will already exist, and will not permeate through the industry as heavily as
the architecture industry. I also
believe that if this were to happen, it will take more than 10 years, as it
will be closer to 20 years.
[1] Allen, Bill. “The
Future of BIM Will Not Be BIM—and It's Coming Faster than You Think.” YouTube,
uploaded by Autodesk University, 23 November 2016, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xq6yKyauu-o
Comment 1 – Gabriel Grajewski:
Gabe, I completely agree that I think it will take more than
10 years for the AEC industry to utilize BIM modeling that was shown in the
video to its full potential. You bring up a good point that higher mathematics
knowledge will be required to use this type of modeling. I would imagine that
future engineers would gain those knowledge in college, prior to becoming an
engineer. If this is the case, then I can absolutely see how this would take
more than 10 years. First the industry would need to show a need for this type
of work to be done (which is may already be doing), then the universities need
to recognize this need, and adjust their curriculums accordingly. Finally, new
students need to enroll in those universities, and complete the coursework, and
then become profession engineers, which is about a 9 year task on its own
(college = 4 years, P.E. = 5 years). If this is the course that the industry
will take, then I agree that it will definitely take more than 10 years.
Comment 2 – Albert Hanan:
Albert, I had the same prediction in my post of about 20
years before the AEC industry adopts advanced BIM modeling like what was shown
in the video in class. My experience I
think is similar to yours, where I worked for a small engineering firm, and
followed that up by working for two mid-sized firms. The smaller firm still used physical stick
sets, which pre-dates AutoCAD, while the mid-sized firms were moving towards
integrating Revit into their projects.
It is interesting to see that both smaller firms like I worked for, and
also larger ones like you worked for (Jacobs Engineering) are still roughly in
the same area. It makes me think that
the AEC industry evolution into BIM is independent from company or industry
size, but rather the interests of a particular company's management team.
Comment 3 – Harvin Bhandal:
Harvin, I mostly agree with your time-frame, although I
think that there is a good chance that it will take longer than 15 years. You also posed a new perspective that I did
not consider, being that all stakeholders must agree to this method as opposed
to traditional engineering methods.
Mostly all people that are experienced and high enough in their
respective companies to be a stakeholder are fairly set in their ways, know
what they are paying for when signing the contract, and may be hesitant to risk
a project they are paying for on a new method that has not been fully vetted by
the industry. As stated in the video,
mostly larger projects with more resources and larger companies will utilize
this technology first, as they have the extra space in their budgets to train
their employees and pay for the software, which should also impact higher
leveled stakeholders. This will
hopefully trickle down into smaller projects over the course of, what I
believe, to be 20 years.
Aaron, I agree it will likely take more than 10 years to truly adopt and integrate BIM into project workflows. There’s a lot of potential for BIM, but it’s something that’s not actively taught in many programs; consider this class, it’s ultimately an elective (save for digital building concentration), there’s no direct teaching of how to use BIM until students get into industry. This slows down the overall adoption of BIM. As a personal example I walked out of high school already knowing the basics of CAD and BIM (Revit), but most in my freshman class hadn’t even learned anything about CAD and it wasn’t until AE 390 (a 4th year class) that there was any specific assignment to learn the basics of Revit.
ReplyDelete