Chapter 5 – BIM for Engineers and Architects – Hailey Ihlow
Building Information Modeling
(BIM) is used as an umbrella term for different programs that have taken design
to the next level. Cad being traditional drafting BIM gives a bit more “By
partially automating the detailing of construction level building models, BIM
redistributes the distribution of effort, placing more emphasis on conceptual
design” (Eastman).
For work I have
only worked on deign build projects. This is not the only type of work my
company does but for the MEP side of things, its more common for the engineers
at this company. We also do an integrated work flow, working in Revit alongside
architects and structural engineers. These methods stated above have their pros
and cons but the overall effect is a positive one. The clarity and output is
well above the mistakes that can happen without these methods using only CADD.
BIM programs allows everyone to see the entire model at a very high level of
detail with actual size of all materials being used. This allows for many
views from the same file. Less time creating views that are already there and
more time discussing seen issues. With this the issues can also be seen easily
and fixed. “As a result, BIM will likely redistribute the
time and effort designers spend in different phases of design.” Stated much
better by Eastman. With this there are more opportunities with design and collaboration.
I have been on
both sides of the spectrum with this not from working with different companies
but working with different projects within the same company. While CADD is not
as versatile as other BIM programs there are still some aspects people do not
want to get rid of. Along with that there are codes that have been designed
around how CADD operates. New York’s Port Authority is an example where BIM is
not 100% applicable due to the codes they have in place. Therefor using BIM programs,
a new set of codes will need to be made, and this takes funding and effort that
might not be allied for a while. There are many applications for
BIM modeling within the AE field. Using them at work has shown me the real
applications and where this technology can go.
Reference
Eastman, Charles M. BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building
Information Modeling for Owners,
Managers,
Designers, Engineers and Contractors. Vol. 2nd edition, Wiley, 2011.
EBSCOhost, http://ezproxy2.library.drexel.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=364239&site=ehost-live.
Comments
1. Weiyi Tang
a. You are totally right. I work in an office
that uses BIM programming for many of the projects. The collaboration we use at
work allows for adjustments as needed and a visual understanding of the model
in a whole new light that 2D drawings do not allow.
2. Kunlun Ren
a. I think that BIM is miss categorized as being a
small part of a project. While your statements are correct I think the task of
going through an entire model with BIM is a necessary, important and sometime difficult
task. The history of BIM is something I should look more into since my current office
uses BIM programs most abundantly.
3. Harvin Bhandal
a. This chapter, chapter 2 seems to have a lot of
good information about the use of BIM. I work with Revit at work creating FP
and P networks for train stations. Revit helps myself and the architects
working on the projects understand why we need more space within the building
and where that might be best to place it. Revit is “easy” to use but does have
its specialties as does any program.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.